Skip to content

Platform

Six apps. One record underneath.

Not six tools that integrate. One platform, so nothing has to be re-entered or reconciled later.

Live ChatEmailSupport FormPhoneOne ticket record

6

apps, sharing one record

72

workflow steps to build with

9

reports, no export step

0

connectors to maintain

Architecture

Eight layers, one record

Top to bottom is the path a request takes. Each layer relies on the one above it rather than on an integration.

01Channels

Live ChatEmailSupport FormPhone

02The ticket record

OpenWaiting on CustomerPendingResolvedClosed

03Customer context

ContactsLeadsTasksLinked tickets

04Knowledge

ArticlesCategoriesFAQsNewsSearch analytics

05Automation

TriggersChecksActionsWaitsSLA policiesTemplates

06Intelligence

AnswerSearch knowledgeClassifyDetect intentSuggest prioritySummariseDraftSentiment

07Insight

Executive overviewSLA levelsTicket operationsChannelsWorkforceGrowth

08Administration

CompanyNotificationsApp settingsTwo-factor authSessions

Why one platform

Separate tools fail slowly

Every seam costs a little context, and the cost lands on the agent rather than on the tool that caused it.

  • Chat becomes email becomes a phone call, each starting from nothing

    The channel changes. The record does not.

  • The answer exists, in a wiki nobody searches

    The article is one click from the composer, and the first thing AMI reads.

  • The escalation path is a document that drifts

    It is a published workflow, with a run history for every ticket it touched.

  • The weekly number and the queue disagree

    Reporting reads the records themselves. There is no export step.

See it with your own conversations in it.

Free plan, no card, no sales call.